Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute and Cato Institute had filed a joint amicus brief before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. Molina, challenging a lower court ruling that essentially gives police a green light to punish and harm suspects solely based upon their initial nonviolent resistance or flight. The legal coalition warned that the ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which granted qualified immunity to a police officer who tased a non-violent suspect in the back after he lay down to surrender, undermines public safety by discouraging suspects from surrendering or complying with police commands.
https://www.activistpost.com/2023/05/police-get-a-green-light-to-use-force-against-unarmed-individuals-who-have-already-surrendered-or-complied.html
https://www.activistpost.com/2023/05/police-get-a-green-light-to-use-force-against-unarmed-individuals-who-have-already-surrendered-or-complied.html
Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute and Cato Institute had filed a joint amicus brief before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. Molina, challenging a lower court ruling that essentially gives police a green light to punish and harm suspects solely based upon their initial nonviolent resistance or flight. The legal coalition warned that the ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which granted qualified immunity to a police officer who tased a non-violent suspect in the back after he lay down to surrender, undermines public safety by discouraging suspects from surrendering or complying with police commands.
https://www.activistpost.com/2023/05/police-get-a-green-light-to-use-force-against-unarmed-individuals-who-have-already-surrendered-or-complied.html