Of its US$3.25 billion biennial 2022-23 budget, 31% comes from assessed contributions paid by Members, with the remainder being voluntary. A large share of voluntary contributions come from Western governments (US, EU, Germany, Norway), development banks (e.g. World Bank Group), and other lesser-known publicly- and privately-funded entities set up for assisting environmental conventions and projects (including the Global Environment Facility, Green Climate Fund and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). Thus, like the WHO, most of its work now consists of implementing the dictates of its donors.
https://www.technocracy.news/the-un-green-agenda-will-spark-famine/
Of its US$3.25 billion biennial 2022-23 budget, 31% comes from assessed contributions paid by Members, with the remainder being voluntary. A large share of voluntary contributions come from Western governments (US, EU, Germany, Norway), development banks (e.g. World Bank Group), and other lesser-known publicly- and privately-funded entities set up for assisting environmental conventions and projects (including the Global Environment Facility, Green Climate Fund and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). Thus, like the WHO, most of its work now consists of implementing the dictates of its donors. https://www.technocracy.news/the-un-green-agenda-will-spark-famine/
WWW.TECHNOCRACY.NEWS
The UN Green Agenda Will Spark Famine
Where did the UN go wrong? Rhetoric aside, it erred from right at the beginning when it decided to meddle with national affairs. However, the old UN was vastly different from today's iteration, which is based on sustainable development, aka Technocracy. Today's agenda has baked in famine for humanity.
0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 340 مشاهدة 0 معاينة
إعلان مُمول
إعلان مُمول