On June 27th, Federal Judge John W. Holcomb dismissed case 2: 24-05286-JWH-RAO with prejudice. He cited “sovereign immunity” (meaning that the US government cannot be sued) as well as lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He also attacked the substance of the Petition for Injunctive Relief, calling the well-substantiated pleading “frivolous and malicious.” In a further exercise of judicial power and prerogative, he attempted to deny a subsequent Notice of Appeal, filed in a timely manner by the Petitioner.
https://www.activistpost.com/2024/08/is-this-federal-judge-trying-to-block-a-civil-rights-action.html
https://www.activistpost.com/2024/08/is-this-federal-judge-trying-to-block-a-civil-rights-action.html
On June 27th, Federal Judge John W. Holcomb dismissed case 2: 24-05286-JWH-RAO with prejudice. He cited “sovereign immunity” (meaning that the US government cannot be sued) as well as lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He also attacked the substance of the Petition for Injunctive Relief, calling the well-substantiated pleading “frivolous and malicious.” In a further exercise of judicial power and prerogative, he attempted to deny a subsequent Notice of Appeal, filed in a timely manner by the Petitioner.
https://www.activistpost.com/2024/08/is-this-federal-judge-trying-to-block-a-civil-rights-action.html
0 Comments
0 Shares
206 Views
0 Reviews