On June 27th, Federal Judge John W. Holcomb dismissed case 2: 24-05286-JWH-RAO with prejudice. He cited “sovereign immunity” (meaning that the US government cannot be sued) as well as lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He also attacked the substance of the Petition for Injunctive Relief, calling the well-substantiated pleading “frivolous and malicious.” In a further exercise of judicial power and prerogative, he attempted to deny a subsequent Notice of Appeal, filed in a timely manner by the Petitioner.
https://www.activistpost.com/2024/08/is-this-federal-judge-trying-to-block-a-civil-rights-action.html
On June 27th, Federal Judge John W. Holcomb dismissed case 2: 24-05286-JWH-RAO with prejudice. He cited “sovereign immunity” (meaning that the US government cannot be sued) as well as lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He also attacked the substance of the Petition for Injunctive Relief, calling the well-substantiated pleading “frivolous and malicious.” In a further exercise of judicial power and prerogative, he attempted to deny a subsequent Notice of Appeal, filed in a timely manner by the Petitioner. https://www.activistpost.com/2024/08/is-this-federal-judge-trying-to-block-a-civil-rights-action.html
WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COM
Is this Federal Judge Trying to Block a Civil Rights Action? - Activist Post
On June 27th, Federal Judge John W. Holcomb dismissed case 2: 24-05286-JWH-RAO with prejudice. He cited "sovereign immunity"...
0 Comments 0 Shares 206 Views 0 Reviews
Sponsored
Sponsored