it’s not the ideology itself that determines whether a system is moral or not, but whether it is based on voluntary participation and bound by ethical constraints like the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP). The NAP opposes theft, assault, fraud, and vandalism, making it clear that no individual or group has the right to initiate force against others. When applied to economic systems, this principle shines a light on how both socialism and capitalism can either promote freedom and voluntary cooperation—or become mechanisms of tyranny.
https://www.activistpost.com/2024/09/voluntary-systems-vs-authoritarian-control-rethinking-the-clash-between-socialism-and-capitalism.html
it’s not the ideology itself that determines whether a system is moral or not, but whether it is based on voluntary participation and bound by ethical constraints like the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP). The NAP opposes theft, assault, fraud, and vandalism, making it clear that no individual or group has the right to initiate force against others. When applied to economic systems, this principle shines a light on how both socialism and capitalism can either promote freedom and voluntary cooperation—or become mechanisms of tyranny. https://www.activistpost.com/2024/09/voluntary-systems-vs-authoritarian-control-rethinking-the-clash-between-socialism-and-capitalism.html
WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COM
Voluntary Systems vs. Authoritarian Control: Rethinking the Clash Between Socialism and Capitalism - Activist Post
The NAP opposes theft, assault, fraud, and vandalism, making it clear that no individual or group has the right to initiate force.
0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 282 Visualizações 0 Anterior
Patrocinado
Patrocinado