The decision is the latest ruling in an eight-year legal battle between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Fluoride Action Network (FAN). The lawsuit began following the EPA’s 2016 decision to deny the plaintiff’s petition under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The first phase of the trial took place in summer 2020 via Zoom and the second phase of the fluoride lawsuit concluded in February in San Francisco.
https://www.activistpost.com/2024/09/federal-judge-rules-fluoride-is-a-neurotoxin-in-historic-lawsuit.html
https://www.activistpost.com/2024/09/federal-judge-rules-fluoride-is-a-neurotoxin-in-historic-lawsuit.html
The decision is the latest ruling in an eight-year legal battle between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Fluoride Action Network (FAN). The lawsuit began following the EPA’s 2016 decision to deny the plaintiff’s petition under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The first phase of the trial took place in summer 2020 via Zoom and the second phase of the fluoride lawsuit concluded in February in San Francisco.
https://www.activistpost.com/2024/09/federal-judge-rules-fluoride-is-a-neurotoxin-in-historic-lawsuit.html
0 Commentaires
0 Parts
262 Vue
0 Aperçu