DHL Group and Neste have agreed to jointly evaluate how Neste’s renewable solutions such as renewable diesel, also known as HVO100, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) can support DHL in its decarbonisation targets in air and road transportation. #DHL #Neste #HVO100 #DHLGroup #sustainableaviationfuel #SAF #emissions

2)​ The Triumph of the Official Narrative: How the TV Networks Hid the Twin Towers’ Explosive Demolition on 9/11 This article is the second installment of a two-part research project we began in July 2020 with the article “How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers’ Explosive Demolition on 9/11.” In that article, our goal was to determine the prevalence, among television reporters on 9/11, of the hypothesis that explosions had brought down the Twin Towers. Through careful review of approximately 70 hours of news coverage on 11 different channels, we found that the explosion hypothesis was not only common among reporters but was, in fact, the dominant hypothesis. Our second question, which we set aside for the present article, was to determine how, despite its prevalence, the explosion hypothesis was supplanted by the hypothesis of fire-induced collapse. We do not see our task as trying to discover whether the Official Narrative of 9/11 is true or false. In the 21 years since the attacks took place, it has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt, we believe, that the Official Narrative is false. While we support and participate in the further accumulation of evidence for this position, as well as the presentation of this evidence to the public, we believe it is also important to look into how the triumph of the Official Narrative was accomplished. If we are able to discover this, we will greatly advance our understanding of the psychological operation conducted on September 11, 2001 — and, thus, our understanding of how other psychological operations are perpetrated on the public. Our argument is that two strategies were employed to accomplish the triumph of the Official Narrative: (a) Where news anchors were sincerely dedicated to discovering the facts of the situation, Strategy One was employed. This strategy involved directly confronting the news anchor of the relevant network with an “expert” who would explain that the destruction of the Twin Towers was caused by structural failure induced by the airplane impact and the ensuing fires. This would allay concerns about reports of explosions in the towers and would domesticate the news anchor so that he or she would stop raising problematic questions. Of course, as we can see clearly today, these experts could not possibly have known what they so confidently proclaimed. In fact, we can now see that their explanations were simply wrong. But their interviews seem to have accomplished their goals on 9/11. (b) Strategy Two was used on all networks, regardless of the stance of the news anchors. This strategy involved developing two related narratives — two engaging, emotionally charged stories — that appeared to explain the day’s horrors and offered viewers a set of active responses. They were not scientific hypotheses and were not directly related to the destruction of the Twin Towers, but indirectly they appeared to favor the fire-induced collapse hypothesis more than the explosion hypothesis. By the end of the day, they had silenced the explosion hypothesis. The first of these two stories is what we shall call the War on Terror narrative. This grand narrative, resonant with older storied events, explained how the righteous, the civilized, the United States had been subjected to an act of war from the evil, the uncivilized, the terrorists supported by nations in the Middle East and Central Asia; and how American leaders must respond to this aggression with an initiative that was warlike on many levels. This narrative was articulated early (before noon on 9/11) and was repeated throughout the day. It established the foundations of the Global War on Terror. The second story is the Bin Laden narrative, which nested within the wider War on Terror narrative and was used to transform myth into plausible history. According to this narrative, an evil Saudi national based in Afghanistan had masterminded the attacks. It is extremely important to grasp the relationship between these two narratives and what may seem as detailed — even esoteric — facts about the destruction of the Twin Towers. If the buildings were destroyed by pre-planted explosives — as we believe has been demonstrated through years of research — the two narratives, however rational and moral they appeared to be to many television viewers, are profoundly misleading in their political analysis and profoundly immoral in their prescriptions. https://www.globalresearch.ca/triumph-official-narrative-how-tv-networks-hid-twin-towers-explosive-demolition-911/5792911

Since 2017, though, bird populations around the wetlands have declined hugely. That was the year the cell-phone companies decided to provide wireless coverage to the southern beaches, which had up till then been largely left alone. Many new cell towers were erected, with panels directed at the beaches fronting the wetlands. The hotels and beach cafes all installed wi-fi. Bird and insect populations plummeted. Lots of small birds are quite capable of living near man, and many nest quite happily in nearby trees or on the roofs of houses. Swallows, house martins and sparrows all nest near man, and the presence of new buildings should not have been, in itself, a reason for these birds to disappear. In the early years, the eaves of hotels along the beaches were lined with swallow and martin nests, and sparrows nested in the roof-tiles. The semi-built, now derelict, hotel project next to the reed-beds was taken over by colonies of swallows till the new cell-towers went in. By 2019, there were no more swallows or martins nesting in any of these buildings. By 2020, a few sparrows had taken over some of the abandoned swallows’ nests. Now even the nests have crumbled away, except for one row of old swallow nests deep under the wooden eaves of one beachside hotel, which are still occupied by a few sparrows. Since 2021, when 5G came to Samos, the insects have largely vanished. Most of the other small birds that lived along these beaches, the chaffinches, goldfinches, greenfinches, serins, wagtails, yellow wagtails, stonechats, whinchats and little reed warblers, are gone. https://www.activistpost.com/2023/05/5g-emg-rf-how-to-kill-a-wetland-the-2023-spring-migration-on-samos-greece.html

This latest prediction/trend/abhorrent concept is only abhorrent here in Western culture! This is a highly westernized threat to what has come to be expected for general living spaces, namely: wide open, spacious, more room than anyone really needs. Western ideals of typical single family housing would seriously house 5 to 10 or more families of so-called developing countries! Even God's Word refers to housing with the entire family sleeping in one room (see one of Christ's illustrations of a man seeking bread from a neighbour at midnight). For whatever reason, we in western societies think that we must live in wide open sprawling spaces and we look down on cultures where that expectation isn't even a thought in their minds, positive or negative. If you look in Scripture, wide open houses is often associated with selfishness, unnecessary decadence, and a sense of pride that lords it over others. But other places in Scripture where we ask God to enlarge our tents, it is to take more in, to reach out and touch more lives, etc. To have one's tent enlarged is seen as an act of increased generosity, not an act of expanding one's own comfort zone. Western culture really does live in the ways of the ungodly wealthy described in Scripture. Nobles and kings lived in sprawling houses throughout much of history while commoners lived in more simple dwellings. Between Scriptural historical reference, secular historical reference, and modern life in many areas of the world, this pod prediction is seriously only a threat to those who have not or are not considering downsizing into smaller living accommodations already. For many in the past in the West, those were empty-nesters, minimalists, nomads, etc. And many of those up to now have been fairly well-to-do financially too. They just wanted a simpler, less-demanding, less-materialistic lifestyle. With the costs of housing going up and the cost of living skyrocketing due to inflation trouble, the ranks of those joining the "van life", those moving into RV's and tiny homes, and those downsizing from large homes into smaller condos or bungalows, has been growing over the past 10 years or more. This really isn't the threat that string pullers think they are predicting! https://www.rebelnews.com/california_startup_offering_citizens_cocoon_like_pods_to_escape_rising_rent_real_estate_costs

Bantam Joe These are the people that are ruling your life. And, causing all this misery. How Interlinked Corporations Rule The World (Written by Chris Kanthan October 19, 2017) Globalism is just like the mafia, but with a lot more complexity and respectability. If you have watched mob films such as The Godfather, you can understand how the world works. For example, in Godfather II, a bunch of mobsters get together in Havana, Cuba, to celebrate Hyman Roth’s birthday. As the birthday cake is symbolically cut into pieces and distributed, Roth tells the group how Cuba will be split up amongst the guests. Extrapolate this scene to the world, you can visualize how the world works. Corporations to Central Banks The power structure of global elites is like nested Russian dolls made up of corporations. How many people realize that KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut are owned by the same corporation? Or that HBO, CNN, TBS, TNT, Cartoon Network all report to the same boss? Or that whether you drink Budweiser, Corona, Stella, Busch or Michelob (and dozens of others), you end up paying one giant corporation? Who controls these corporations? It’s not the CEO, as most people believe. The real control lies in the hands of the largest shareholders and/or the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors of all giant corporations are linked to each other by one or two degrees of separation. Some elites even sit on multiple boards at the same time. For example, Rochelle Lazarus sits on the boards of Merck, GE and Blackstone; Jon Huntsman sits on the boards of Hilton, Ford, Caterpillar and Chevron; and Timothy P. Flynn is a director at JP Morgan Chase, Wal-Mart, Alcoa and United Healthcare. Think for a moment how all these corporations would seem totally unrelated to a regular person. Below is an image that show how the Boards at Netflix and Procter & Gamble are linked to some other popular corporations. (Note: this is a partial list of connections). The Board of Directors report to the next level of bosses, the financial overlords. All the public corporations in the West – and much of the world now – are controlled by large shareholders, who are giant financial corporations. Thus a study in 2011 showed that fewer than 150 mega corporations pretty much control all the corporations in the world! Some of these have recognizable names such as Barclays or JP Morgan; other names such as State Street or AXA are hardly known outside the financial circles, yet they have incredible influence and wealth. For these people, it doesn’t matter if you buy Pepsi or Coke; cars from GM or Ford or Toyota; or produce from Walmart or Safeway. It also doesn’t matter to them if you watch ABC or NBC or Fox. Your money goes to the same place. There are also a few individuals like Carl Icahn or Paul Singer, who can borrow billions of dollars at 0%, buy tons of shares of a corporation, change its policies (say, the dividends given out), and make a killing few months later. This is how the financial mafia’s shakedown works. On the top of the food chain are the central banks who have the amazing ability to create money out of thin air. As Rothschild once said, “Give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I don’t care who makes the laws.” These people are the ultimate Godfathers of globalism. They determine the winners and the losers in capitalism, and thus control all the corporations (including the media), politicians, militaries, and the Deep States around the world. How to use Corporations All these corporations are but tools to be used for a higher purpose – controlling people. The financial system is the primary tool used to control nations. Any nation’s debt, wealth, credit rating, stock market, etc. can be manipulated by Wall Street, which is the financial weapon of mass destruction. There are other corporations that wield power in less obvious ways. GMOs are effective weapons in controlling nations (if a country has to buy seeds and pesticides from foreign corporations every year, that country will stay submissive). Big Pharma and medicines also create dependencies in people and nations. Above all, globalists strive for the ability to control what people think. This is where media, entertainment and the Internet come into play. Fortunately, all are corporatized, so that Facebook, Twitter, Google, mainstream media, and Hollywood can all work together to form the Ministry of Truth and control what people all over the world feel, think and believe.