Canada should follow the U.S. lead in removing fluoride from drinking water! President-elect Trump’s appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead health policy includes a pledge to remove fluoridation from drinking water, citing growing evidence of brain damaging health risks and ineffectiveness, supported by experts like Dr. Robert Dickson who hopes Canada will follow suit. 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #JustSayNoMore 🇨🇦 https://www.rebelnews.com/canada_should_follow_the_u_s_lead_in_removing_fluoride_from_drinking_water

Now here is another WIN for WE THE PEOPLE . . . https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rfk-jr-says-trump-plans-remove-fluoride-american-drinking-water

Montreal Is PHASING OUT FLUORIDE After Federal Judge RULES IT’S A NEUROTOXIN In Historic Lawsuit!!! https://old.bitchute.com/video/zbCJFrXd4EZ8/

When Grand Rapids, Michigan, became the first city to add fluoride to its water supply in 1945, it was hailed as a major public health innovation aimed at preventing cavities. Many other cities quickly followed suit, and water fluoridation became a widespread practice nationwide. In September, a federal judge ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to take regulatory action on fluoride, citing evidence that community water fluoridation at 0.7 mg/L may pose an unreasonable risk to children’s health under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The court did not mandate specific steps, leaving the EPA “obliged to take regulatory action in response.” https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/how-remove-fluoride-your-water-home

Metal nanoparticles are the submicron scale artifacts made of pure metals such as gold, silver, titanium, zinc, platinum, cerium, iron, thallium, or their compounds like oxides, hydroxides, sulfides, phosphates, fluorides, and chlorides. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/metal-nanoparticles

On Tuesday a federal court in California found that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligram per liter “poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children”. The new ruling issued by Judge Edward Chen noted that the finding does not “conclude with certainty” that fluoridated water is “injurious to public health” but does find there is “an unreasonable risk of such injury”. This risk is sufficient to require the EPA to enact a regulatory response, Chen wrote. https://www.activistpost.com/2024/09/federal-judge-rules-fluoride-is-a-neurotoxin-in-historic-lawsuit.html

In fact, he wrote in detail on the controversy over fluoridation. His analysis stands the test of time. A federal judge has finally ruled, three-quarters a century too late, that forced fluoride in the water amounts to an “unreasonable risk” to children. This decision could finally end the practice. https://www.activistpost.com/2024/09/murray-rothbard-on-forced-fluoridation.html

A federal judge has ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to further regulate fluoride in drinking water because high levels could pose a risk to the intellectual development of children. that the government’s use of fluoridation, especially in specific communities, might be part of a deliberate attempt to lower intelligence in order to create a more compliant and subservient population for the New World Order. https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/conspiracy-confirmed-fluoride-drinking-water-may-lower-kids-iqs-judge-rules

The decision is the latest ruling in an eight-year legal battle between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Fluoride Action Network (FAN). The lawsuit began following the EPA’s 2016 decision to deny the plaintiff’s petition under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The first phase of the trial took place in summer 2020 via Zoom and the second phase of the fluoride lawsuit concluded in February in San Francisco. https://www.activistpost.com/2024/09/federal-judge-rules-fluoride-is-a-neurotoxin-in-historic-lawsuit.html

So, it has now been allowed public information that the fluoridation of water LOWERS the IQ of children, but the CDC still stands behind the need to fluoridate water. Think about that. Do you REALLY trust the CDC? Now, think about this: Fluoride most likely can help protect teeth. When you drink water, you typically swallow it, not wash your teeth with it. Thus, it makes little to no sense to believe putting fluoride in water is good for teeth. (But it IS good for the aluminum, steel, phospate, glass and cement industries to get rid of their hazardous byproduct, fluoride, which is highly toxic and would otherwise cost billions to dispose of properly). The National Toxicology Program on Wednesday published a report, years after efforts to suppress it finally failed. The report concluded with “moderate confidence” that higher levels of fluoride exposure in drinking water are consistently linked to lower IQs in kids.​ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ntp-fluoride-report-neurotoxic-kids-published/