Not cost effective? NOT COST EFFECTIVE? Who gives a rat's hairy behind what you think Gates? Cost Effective and the life of my family do not fit together. As Elon Musk stated so eloquently, GO FUCK YOURSELF.
NOT A DOCTOR Bill Gates argues that it is not cost-effective to provide individuals with long-term healthcare. Instead, Gates believes his fellow human beings should be euthanized to reduce healthcare costs so that the money that would have been used for treatments can be spent elsewhere.
In 2010, Gates weighed up the cost of keeping “terminally ill” Americans alive versus paying for teachers’ salaries. Gates lamented: Americans are unwilling to question if spending money on people in the last three months of their lives was cost-effective.
He suggested: [T[here wasn’t a benefit in end-of-life care and a decision should be made to end people’s lives instead of providing costly palliative care.
He argued: [A] panel of bureaucrats should decide whether a person deserves to receive treatment, with those who are not ‘worthy of healthcare’ being euthanized by the government to save money.
Concerning the group who would decide whether people get to live or die, he said: That’s called the ‘death panel.’​
https://defconnews.com/2025/01/09/it-was-bill-gates-who-started-the-call-for-death-panels-to-euthanize-citizens-not-worthy-of-healthcare-several-countries-are-now-there/
NOT A DOCTOR Bill Gates argues that it is not cost-effective to provide individuals with long-term healthcare. Instead, Gates believes his fellow human beings should be euthanized to reduce healthcare costs so that the money that would have been used for treatments can be spent elsewhere.
In 2010, Gates weighed up the cost of keeping “terminally ill” Americans alive versus paying for teachers’ salaries. Gates lamented: Americans are unwilling to question if spending money on people in the last three months of their lives was cost-effective.
He suggested: [T[here wasn’t a benefit in end-of-life care and a decision should be made to end people’s lives instead of providing costly palliative care.
He argued: [A] panel of bureaucrats should decide whether a person deserves to receive treatment, with those who are not ‘worthy of healthcare’ being euthanized by the government to save money.
Concerning the group who would decide whether people get to live or die, he said: That’s called the ‘death panel.’​
https://defconnews.com/2025/01/09/it-was-bill-gates-who-started-the-call-for-death-panels-to-euthanize-citizens-not-worthy-of-healthcare-several-countries-are-now-there/
Not cost effective? NOT COST EFFECTIVE? Who gives a rat's hairy behind what you think Gates? Cost Effective and the life of my family do not fit together. As Elon Musk stated so eloquently, GO FUCK YOURSELF.
NOT A DOCTOR Bill Gates argues that it is not cost-effective to provide individuals with long-term healthcare. Instead, Gates believes his fellow human beings should be euthanized to reduce healthcare costs so that the money that would have been used for treatments can be spent elsewhere.
In 2010, Gates weighed up the cost of keeping “terminally ill” Americans alive versus paying for teachers’ salaries. Gates lamented: Americans are unwilling to question if spending money on people in the last three months of their lives was cost-effective.
He suggested: [T[here wasn’t a benefit in end-of-life care and a decision should be made to end people’s lives instead of providing costly palliative care.
He argued: [A] panel of bureaucrats should decide whether a person deserves to receive treatment, with those who are not ‘worthy of healthcare’ being euthanized by the government to save money.
Concerning the group who would decide whether people get to live or die, he said: That’s called the ‘death panel.’​
https://defconnews.com/2025/01/09/it-was-bill-gates-who-started-the-call-for-death-panels-to-euthanize-citizens-not-worthy-of-healthcare-several-countries-are-now-there/
0 Comments
0 Shares
97 Views
0 Reviews